Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Banksy and His Art Works



UK-based street artist Banksy is a notable half-exception to this rule. His work is currently seen around the planet. There are few in the art world (street or otherwise) who don’t know his signature style. The exception, though, is that no one is sure just who he is. There have been many claims to know his true identity but none have ever been definitive to date.
Who is Banksy? We may not know his real name, but his art is unmistakably the work of a passionate individual. So what do we know about Banksy? His paintings, stencils, and other art pieces frequently address serious social issues. He takes on capitalism, war, poverty, and governments with grace. His work often displays a keen sense of humor, making it equally possible that you will laugh or cast your eyes down thoughtfully upon seeing a Banksy piece.



Banksy is a pseudonymous (fake name) British graffiti artist. He is believed to be a native of YateSouth Gloucestershire, near Bristol and to have been born in 1974, but his identity is unknown. According to Tristan Manco, Banksy "was born in 1974 and raised in Bristol, England. The son of a photocopier technician, he trained as a butcher but became involved in graffiti during the great Bristol aerosol boom of the late 1980s." His artworks are often satirical pieces of art on topics such as politics, culture, and ethics. 
His street art, which combines graffiti writing with a distinctive stencilling technique, is similar to Blek le Rat, who began to work with stencils in 1981 in Paris and members of the anarcho-punk band Crass who maintained a graffiti stencil campaign on the London Tube System in the late 1970s and early 1980s. His art has appeared in cities around the world.

His refusal to be interviewed in person or even to reveal his real name has added to his mystique over the years. In the UK (and, increasingly, in other parts of the world) Banksy-spotters claim to know the artist’s real identity on a fairly regular basis. Although he’s been caught on CCTV a few times, he is clever enough to keep his identity a mystery.



There is good reason for leaving us guessing about Banksy. Banksy’s work has been equated with vandalism on several occasions, and many have called for his prosecution. His choice of subject matter coupled with his medium (typically spray paint on pubic walls).

Banksy’s talents aren’t limited to paint and the occasional pencil drawing. He has been responsible for a number of social commentaries involving replacing hundreds of Paris Hilton CDs with CDs of his own creation. He has sneaked his own work into several art museums, including a prehistoric-looking piece at the British Museum which the museum decided to add to their own permanent collection.

Just as controversial as his methods is Banksy’s take on the art world at large. He has been known to deride other artists for their self-importance and “inferior” art forms. He has even taken on the people who buy his art. Following a 2006 Sotheby’s auction of several of his works. He produced an illustration of an auction on his official website featuring the words “I can’t believe you morons actually buy this shit.” He is a vocal opponent of the organized art world, though he now produces some work that is more conventional than his street art roots.
Banksy’s work is applauded by many, but some critics say that it oversimplifies issues to appeal to the masses. Other critics – most notably, representatives from Keep Britain Tidy – believe that Banksy’s street art is a crime and that he is setting a negative example for other would-be graffiti artists.

Through his talent and his dedication to art and his personal statements, Banksy has become perhaps the most famous anonymous artist ever. We still don’t know his true identity or where he will pop up next, but just mentioning his pseudonym brings a look of recognition of the faces of anyone who knows anything about art.

Love him or not, Banksy is without a doubt one of the most influential artists working today. He has affected the art world from Australia to the US and nearly everywhere in between.



What’s more is that many of Banksy’s works are extremely transient. Beautiful as they are, they are usually gone within hours. They are removed and painted over by city workers who adhere to a zero-tolerance policy on graffiti.
It is perhaps this transience, in part, that has led to such an explosion in Banksy admiration. His pieces are difficult to see, nearly impossible to own, and can be enjoyed by most people only as images on a computer screen. Those who are lucky enough to see one of his works in person often take a photograph of it, knowing that if they return to the spot tomorrow it may not be there. In most cases it will have been painted over, but an increasingly common possibility is that it will have been purchased and moved to another location. It’s not hard to imagine a time in the future when elusive photos of Banksy works will be worth nearly as much as his original pieces of art themselves. 

A turning point came when Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt purchased several of his works for a total of more than $400,000. After that, owning an original Banksy was no longer reserved for the odd street-art enthusiast or lucky owner of a graffitied London wall. Now, having a Banksy in the house is a downright mainstream ambition.
A man in London sold a Banksy picture that appeared on the wall of his garage for only $2000 and a full-size reproduction of the piece. The purchaser paid about $60,000 having the piece removed, but he still came out ahead as the mural may be worth as much as $600,000.


Banksy does not sell photos of street graffiti. Art auctioneers have been known to attempt to sell his street art on location and leave the problem of its removal in the hands of the winning bidder.


Chinatown, New York City

This Art work is a Picture of rat with scissors cutting painter’s cradle. Rats are another favorite of Banksy and he uses them as funny devices and to get serious points across. This joke image is found on Canal Street and West Broadway. 

Africa


Banksy had their newest street work spotted in Africa. Originally rumors had surfaced that the work was done in Cairo, but it is now rumored to be Mali. Regardless of where it is, Banksy has always been cutting edge on picking locations, creating pieces and really challenging the norm/stan



London


Banksy pulled off an audacious stunt to produce what is believed to be his biggest work yet in central London.
The secretive graffiti artist managed to erect three storeys of scaffolding behind a security fence despite being watched by a CCTV camera. Then, during darkness and hidden behind a sheet of polythene, he painted this comment on 'Big Brother' society.


'One nation under CCTV': CCTV (pictured top right) failed to catch Banksy.
Yesterday the scaffolding gang returned to remove all evidence - again without the camera operator stopping them. The work, above a Post Office yard in Newman Street near Oxford Circus, shows a small boy, watched by a security guard, painting the words: 'One nation under CCTV.'
Andrew Newman, 35, a businessman from Dulwich, who works locally, said: 'It was only on Sunday morning that the Post Offices guys realised what had happened.'






Despite being observed by CCTV cameras, elusive grafitti artist Baksy managed to create his latest - and biggest - work to date under the cover of darkness.




I really enjoy looking at his work, and this is because of his clever ideas. The picture of a rat with scissors cutting painter’s cradle is quite a joke, showing a rat being at a large size doing something unpleasant to the human when usually it's quite the opposite.


 The second picture i've put here is Banksy's work in Africa. I like this one because it's imaginative and it's interesting because until today we still ask amongst each other wether Zebras are white with black stripes, or Black with White stripes. But in this picture, it clearly shows that Zebras or this particular zebra is White with Black stripes; that are being hung to dry. 


The last picture that i have put up is one of Banksy's biggest works in London. I think this work was very audacious and sneaky. The words he used are somewhat true ("One nation under cctv") and his ideas and words are brilliant to come up with such things.




Resources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy
http://weburbanist.com/2008/07/29/banksy-photos-prints-and-tattoos-part-three-in-an-eight-part-banksy-art-series/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-559547/Graffiti-artist-Banksy-pulls-audacious-stunt-date--despite-watched-CCTV.html
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-images-by-street-artist

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Industrial Revolution and Industrialism

Definition of the Industrial Revolution and Industrialism.
The Industrial Revolution was a period from the 18th to the 19th century where major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, and transport had a profound effect on the socioeconomic and cultural conditions starting in the United Kingdom, then subsequently spreading throughout Europe, North America, and eventually the world. The onset of the Industrial Revolution marked a major turning point in human history; almost every aspect of daily life was eventually influenced in some way.  The term ‘Industrial Revolution’ was first popularized by the English economic historian Arnold Toynbee (1852–83) to describe England’s economic development from 1760 to 1840. Since Toynbee’s time the term has been more broadly applied.’. The Industrial Revolution brought us better utilization of crop and cattle; it saw the improvement of manufacture and transport with the invention of the steam engine by Thomas Newcomen together with John Calley in 1712.
Industrialism - An economic and social system based on the development of large-scale industries and marked by the production of large quantities of inexpensive manufactured goods and the concentration of employment in urban factories.’ Industrialism increases the ‘wealth-creating capacity of modern societies compared with traditional systems’ 

Research Monet's painting 'Impression Sunrise' (1873) to analyze the work in relation to Industrialization.
In the late 1860s, Claude Monet (1840-1926), Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) and others painted in a new style, called Impressionism by contemporaries. The name was first used by critics, viewing a new exhibition held in 1874, and was directed precisely — and derisively — at a painting by Monet of a harbor at dawn, which he titled Impression: Sunrise. This painting is a striking example of the new style. How did Monet achieve the effect in this particular painting?




The sun is set against the dawn, the orange color against the gray and the vibrant force of the sun against its motionless surroundings. To many spectators, the sun undulates or pulsates slightly. Why is this so? The sun is nearly the same luminance as the grayish clouds. Notice how the sun nearly disappears if you remove the color. This lack of contrast explains the painting’s eerie quality.
The sun is perceived differently is different parts of our mind. To the more primitive subdivisions of our brain, the sun is nearly invisible. But to the primate subdivision, the sun appears normal. Thus, there is an inconsistency between our perception of the sun in the primitive and primateportions of our brain. The sun is poorly defined and ambiguous to the portion of our brain that carries information about position and movement.
Although it seems that the sun is the brightest spot on the canvas, it is in fact, when measured with a photometer, the same brightness (or luminance) as the sky.
Dr. Margaret Livingstone, a professor of neurobiology at Harvard University, said "If you make a black and white copy of Impression: Sunrise, the Sun disappears [almost] entirely."
If Monet had painted the sun brighter than the clouds (as indeed it is), the painting might be less interesting. If you artificially make the sun brighter or darker (as it is in reality), the primitive brain sees it better. But does that make the painting better or worse?

Olafur Eliasson's 'Weather Project'(2006) is a contemporary work that relates to Monet's famous landscape.
The similarity between Olafur Eliasson’s work and Manet’s work is the use of colours, the illusion of the sun and the oversized lamp. The lamps Eliasson used connects to the sun and creates a late afternoon scene almost to sunset. Both Works creates warmth with the use orange, yellow and grey and black and both work seem to concentrate most on the Sun/Lamp; both being in the centre and the brightest.








Resources :
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution)
(http://www.webexhibits.org/colorart/monet.html)
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olafur_Eliasson#The_weather_project)



Monday, April 5, 2010

Damien Hirst and the Diamond Skull

















Damien Hirst and The Diamond Skull 
"For The Love of God"




Damien Hirst is a famous English artist known for contemporary art and according to Wikipedia 'he has been claimed to be the richest living artist to date’. With Hirst's creations mostly based on the theme of death he has created some of Britain's most famous works, e.g. The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living', which involved the dead bodies of animals, such as a 14-foot (4.3 m) tiger shark, sheep and a cow preserved in formaldehyde. This became the iconic work of British art in the 1990s. 


His most recent work “For the Love of God” which was created in 2007 is a piece that according to Wikipedia was apparently inspired by his mother after she asked “For the love of God, what are you going to do next?”


The work is a platinum cast of a skull from an actual person that lived between 1720 and 1810. He was a 35 year old man from Europe. The skull is covered with 8,601 diamonds including a large pink diamond on the forehead and everything is covered except for the human teeth. This work took about 18 month for it to be fullly done and ready to be displayed.

This art work is now held at the White Cube gallery in London, this work costs fourteen million pounds which is $30.4m NZD to make, and was sold for fifty million pounds which is $108m NZD. This art work is the most expensive art ever made. 

The ideas behind this work have a direct link to the Renaissance concepts of Mercantillism and the (increased) status of the artist. Mercantilism in the Renaissance era was wealth measured by the possession of precious metal e.g. gold and silver. Hirst’s latest work is the most expensive piece of contemporary art to date, which in return has elevated Hirst’s status along with his diamond-incrusted skull.




"If anyone but Hirst had made this curious object, we would be struck by its vulgarity.”
Richard Dorment from the daily telegraph

Work of art? He is not an artist. It's all commercial value to him. Is this just another way for rich people to deal with their time and excess of money. If Paris Hilton or Ali G say they did it, instead of Hirst, would you call that art? or just another publicity stunt?”
Art News Blog



"It works much better than I imagined. I was slightly worried that we'd end up with an Ali G ring"

"I wouldn't mind if it happened to my skull after my death."
Damien Hirst 

This piece works because of his status as an artist. Without Hirst' status of being a contemporary artist, he would not be able to make the artwork (the funding/benefits), it certainly wouldn't be as successful, and most people would definitely not view it the same way as other art in its genre.

A lot of people feel very strongly about it, either negatively or positively, but that's part of the job of an artist; to make people think or look at things in a different way. So, in the responses that it has provoked, it succeeds as a work of art.

Reference:
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-459204/Damien-Hirst-unveils-jewels-crown-50m-diamond-studded-skull.html)
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6712015.stm)